Compare
SwiftCNS vs ChatGPT or Claude on their own
SwiftCNS works inside them. On their own, they don’t keep a record of what you decided last quarter, can’t show it to your board, and won’t hold you to success criteria set before the result. SwiftCNS adds that, shared across your team and your agents.
side by side
ChatGPT or Claude on their ownSwiftCNS
Success criteriaYou can ask for them, but nothing holds them in place once results arrive.You approve them before the experiment runs, and then they’re locked.
What’s keptConversations, plus whatever the tool’s memory or projects retain.A Decision Record per idea: assumption, experiment, criteria, evidence, decision and who decided.
Who can see itMostly the person who had the conversation.Your team, in a shared workspace, with access set by workspace and project.
Agents and past decisionsAn agent starts from what’s in its context.Agents read past records over MCP before they propose, so a dropped idea stays dropped.
Who decidesYou.You. SwiftCNS proposes; a person approves the criteria and makes the decision.
Showing your workCopy and paste from chats.A record you can walk an investor, a board or a new hire through.
Use them together
Keep using ChatGPT or Claude. SwiftCNS connects to Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and any MCP client, including Claude.ai and ChatGPT through custom connectors, so the test and the record happen where you already work.
Reach for ChatGPT or Claude
- Brainstorming and drafting
- Research and summaries
- Quick questions with nothing riding on the answer
Reach for SwiftCNS
- An idea that will cost real time or money if it’s wrong
- A decision your team, board or investors will ask about later
- Work your AI agents will build on next quarter